Current:Home > InvestKansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds -ProfitZone
Kansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds
View
Date:2025-04-14 16:44:20
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas isn’t enforcing a new law requiring abortion providers to ask patients why they want to terminate their pregnancies, as a legal challenge against that rule and other older requirements makes its way through the courts.
Attorneys for the state and for providers challenging the new law along with other requirements announced a deal Thursday. In return for not enforcing the law, the state will get another four months to develop its defense of the challenged restrictions ahead of a trial now delayed until late June 2025. The agreement was announced during a Zoom hearing in Johnson County District Court in the Kansas City area.
Kansas doesn’t ban most abortions until the 22nd week of pregnancy. Its clinics now see thousands of patients from other states with near bans on abortion, most notably Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.
Last fall, District Judge K. Christopher Jayaram blocked enforcement of requirements that include rules spelling out what providers must tell their patients, and a longstanding requirement that patients wait 24 hours after consulting a provider to undergo a procedure. On July 1, he allowed the providers to add a challenge to the new reporting law to their existing lawsuit rather than making them file a separate case.
The new law was supposed to take effect July 1 and would require providers to ask patients questions from a state script about their reasons for an abortion, although patients wouldn’t be forced to answer. Potential reasons include not being able to afford a child, not wanting a disabled child, not wanting to put schooling or a career on hold, and having an abusive spouse or partner. Clinics would be required to send data about patients’ answers to the state health department for a public report every six months.
“We are relieved that this intrusive law will not take effect,” the Center for Reproductive Rights, the national organization for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate said in a joint statement. “This law would have forced abortion providers to collect deeply personal information — an unjustifiable invasion of patient privacy that has nothing to do with people’s health.”
Kansas already collects data about each abortion, such as the method and the week of pregnancy, but abortion opponents argue that having more information will aid in setting policies for helping pregnant women and new mothers. The Republican-controlled Legislature enacted the law over a veto from Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
At least eight other states have such reporting requirements, but the Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that the state constitution protects access to abortion as a part of a “fundamental” right to bodily autonomy. In August 2022, Kansas voters decisively rejected a proposed amendment to say that the constitution doesn’t grant any right to abortion access.
The trial of the providers’ lawsuit had been set for late February 2025 before Jayaram delayed it in responded to the parties’ deal.
“The state is prepared to accept an agreement not to enforce the new law until the final judgment, provided that we get a schedule that accommodates the record that we think we need to develop in this case,” said Lincoln Wilson, a senior counsel for the anti-abortion Alliance Defending Freedom, which is leading the state’s defense of its laws.
Abortion providers suggested July 1 that the state wouldn’t enforce the new reporting requirement while the lawsuit proceeded, but the health department did not confirm that when reporters asked about it.
veryGood! (7)
Related
- Trump invites nearly all federal workers to quit now, get paid through September
- Americans want to protect IVF amid battles over abortion, but Senate at odds over path forward
- American Airlines drops law firm that said a 9-year-old girl should have seen camera on toilet seat
- Video shows Nissan SUV catch on fire in family's driveway; carmaker is investigating
- Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
- 33 things to know about Indy 500: Kyle Larson goes for 'Double' and other drivers to watch
- Missing womens' bodies found buried on farm property linked to grandma accused in complex murder plan, documents show
- Workers at Georgia school bus maker Blue Bird approve their first union contract
- Krispy Kreme offers a free dozen Grinch green doughnuts: When to get the deal
- Rapper Sean Kingston and his mother stole more than $1 million through fraud, authorities say
Ranking
- DoorDash steps up driver ID checks after traffic safety complaints
- NOAA 2024 Hurricane Forecast Is for More Storms Than Ever Before
- Say That You Love This Photo of Pregnant Hailey Bieber Baring Her Baby Bump During Trip With Justin
- NCAA women's lacrosse semifinals preview: Northwestern goes for another title
- Where will Elmo go? HBO moves away from 'Sesame Street'
- Animal attacks reported across USA this spring. This piece of advice could save your life.
- Does Adobe Lightroom have AI? New tools offer 'erase' feature with just one click
- Voting rights advocates ask federal judge to toss Ohio voting restrictions they say violate ADA
Recommendation
IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
Prosecutor tells jury that self-exiled wealthy Chinese businessman cheated thousands of $1 billion
Workers at Georgia school bus maker Blue Bird approve their first union contract
Millie Bobby Brown Marries Jake Bongiovi in Private Ceremony
US wholesale inflation accelerated in November in sign that some price pressures remain elevated
U.K. review reveals death toll at little-known Nazi camp on British soil
Why King Charles III, Prince William and the Royal Family Are Postponing Public Engagements
8 injured in airboat crash in central Florida, deputies say