Current:Home > FinanceMexican man wins case against Cartier after buying $13,000 earrings online for $13 -ProfitZone
Mexican man wins case against Cartier after buying $13,000 earrings online for $13
View
Date:2025-04-15 20:25:58
A typo on Cartier's website that incorrectly priced a pair of gold-and-diamond earrings ended up being a costly mistake for the luxury jewelry retailer.
A consumer in Mexico said in a post on social media platform X that he was idly browsing Instagram when he came across the shockingly low-priced pair of earrings.
Typically 237,000 pesos, or more than $13,000, the jewelry was listed for sale for 237 pesos, or about $13, the New York Times reported. It appears Cartier omitted three zeros, sheerly by mistake.
When Rogelio Villarreal, a Mexican doctor, saw the low price, he broke out in a cold sweat, he said in the post.
Upon clicking to purchase the earrings, Villarreal unwittingly kicked off a monthslong dispute with the luxury retailer that even drew interest from public figures.
Initially, Cartier tried to cancel the order altogether and compensate Villarreal with a bottle of champagne and leather accessory to apologize for the inconvenience it had caused, according to reporting from Agence France Presse. But Villarreal deemed the offer unsatisfactory, and instead raised the case with Mexico's federal consumer protection agency.
Villareal told the New York Times that Cartier had informed him it had fulfilled his order. "War is over. Cartier is complying," he said in an April 22 post.
Cartier did not immediately respond to CBS MoneyWatch's request for comment. Mexico's federal consumer protection agency also did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
✨Once upon a December✨ pic.twitter.com/3wMvT7AjLw
— dre pute (@LordeDandy) April 26, 2024
Villarreal posted an image of two small wrapped boxes with Cartier's signature wax stamp, indicating the earrings had arrived. Not everyone was as happy as the buyer with the outcome.
Mexican Senator Lilly Téllez weighed in, saying in a post on X that she didn't think Villarreal should have been entitled to keep the earrings simply because a retailer had made a mistake. "Kids: What the buyer of the Cartier earrings did is not correct,"the senator wrote. "It's wrong to be opportunistic and take advantage of a mistake at the expense of someone else, and abuse the law, even if it's in your favor, and outwit a business. It is more important to be honorable than to have a pair of Cartier earrings."
Megan CerulloMegan Cerullo is a New York-based reporter for CBS MoneyWatch covering small business, workplace, health care, consumer spending and personal finance topics. She regularly appears on CBS News 24/7 to discuss her reporting.
veryGood! (3571)
Related
- NHL in ASL returns, delivering American Sign Language analysis for Deaf community at Winter Classic
- Migrant boat disaster: What to know about the tragedy off the coast of Greece
- Prince Harry Feared Being Ousted By Royals Over Damaging Rumor James Hewitt Is His Dad
- New York City Aims for All-Electric Bus Fleet by 2040
- 'As foretold in the prophecy': Elon Musk and internet react as Tesla stock hits $420 all
- Western Coal Takes Another Hit as Appeals Court Rules Against Export Terminal
- In Attacks on Environmental Advocates in Canada, a Disturbing Echo of Extremist Politics in the US
- Global Warming Is Worsening China’s Pollution Problems, Studies Show
- Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
- Taylor Swift Totally Swallowed a Bug During Her Eras Tour Stop in Chicago
Ranking
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Abbott Elementary’s Tyler James Williams Addresses Dangerous Sexuality Speculation
- Jet Tila’s Father’s Day Gift Ideas Are Great for Dads Who Love Cooking
- Harvard, universities across U.S. react to Supreme Court's affirmative action ruling
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Harvard's admission process is notoriously tough. Here's how the affirmative action ruling may affect that.
- China’s Ability to Feed Its People Questioned by UN Expert
- Does aspartame have health risks? Here's what studies have found about the sweetener as WHO raises safety questions.
Recommendation
Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
In Exxon Climate Fraud Case, Judge Rejects Defense Tactic that Attacked the Prosecutor
Spoil Your Dad With the Best Father's Day Gift Ideas Under $50 From Nordstrom Rack
Does aspartame have health risks? Here's what studies have found about the sweetener as WHO raises safety questions.
Jorge Ramos reveals his final day with 'Noticiero Univision': 'It's been quite a ride'
A German Initiative Seeks to Curb Global Emissions of a Climate Super-Pollutant
Trump Administration Offers Drilling Leases in the Arctic Wildlife Refuge, but No Major Oil Firms Bid
Midwest Flooding Exposes Another Oil Pipeline Risk — on Keystone XL’s Route