Current:Home > reviewsJudge orders new North Dakota legislative district for 2 Native American tribes -ProfitZone
Judge orders new North Dakota legislative district for 2 Native American tribes
View
Date:2025-04-27 08:37:56
BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — A federal judge on Monday ordered a new joint North Dakota legislative district for two Native American tribes that successfully argued a map created through redistricting in 2021 violated the Voting Rights Act by diluting their voting strength.
U.S. District Court Chief Judge Peter Welte’s decision to adopt and implement a new map comes after a flurry of court filings in the lawsuit since his Nov. 17 ruling that the state’s 2021 redistricting map “prevents Native American voters from having an equal opportunity to elect candidates of their choice.”
The judge had given North Dakota Republican Secretary of State Michael Howe and the GOP-controlled Legislature until Dec. 22 “to adopt a plan to remedy the violation.” The deadline passed with no new map as Howe and lawmakers sought a delay of the judge’s ruling and more time to respond.
Welte said the new map “requires changes to only three districts and is the least intrusive option that complies with the Voting Rights Act and the Constitution.”
The Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians and the Spirit Lake Tribe brought the lawsuit in early 2022. They alleged the 2021 redistricting map “simultaneously packs Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians members into one house district, and cracks Spirit Lake Tribe members out of any majority Native house district.”
In an emailed statement, plaintiffs’ attorney Tim Purdon said the tribes welcome the ruling for the 2024 elections.
“The map that will be used in 2024 is the same Voting Right Act-compliant map the Tribes originally recommended to the Redistricting Committee and the full Legislature during the 2021 redistricting process,” he said. “The time has come for the Legislature and the Secretary of State to stop spending taxpayer dollars litigating against fair maps in North Dakota.”
Days after Welte’s November ruling, Howe announced his plans to appeal, citing a new 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that private individuals and groups such as the NAACP can’t sue under a critical section of the landmark civil rights law.
Welte and the 8th Circuit denied Howe’s requests to delay the November ruling pending appeal. Late last month, the 8th Circuit denied the Legislature’s request to extend the Dec. 22 deadline to Feb. 9.,
Soon afterward, the Legislature asked Welte for the same extension, saying it “has made substantial headway toward the development of a remedial redistricting plan.” At the same time, the tribes asked the judge to deny the extension and to impose one of their two maps presented in federal court, by Dec. 31. On Monday, Welte denied the Legislature’s request for more time and granted the tribes’ request for a new map.
Republican House Majority Leader Mike Lefor said he had not seen the ruling when reached by The Associated Press, and declined to immediately comment. Howe did not immediately respond to a phone message or a text message.
The Legislature last month restarted its redistricting panel to begin to address Welte’s ruling and to review options of maps, including the tribes’ plans. The committee is scheduled to meet again on Tuesday.
In 2021, the two tribes unsuccessfully proposed a single legislative district encompassing the two reservations, which are roughly 60 miles (97 kilometers) apart. Their lawsuit culminated in a trial in June in Fargo; Welte ruled months afterward.
North Dakota has 47 legislative districts, each with one senator and two representatives. Republicans control the House of Representatives 82-12 and the Senate 43-4. At least two lawmakers, both House Democrats, are members of tribes.
The Legislature created four subdistricts in the state House, including one each for the Fort Berthold and Turtle Mountain Indian reservations.
Lawmakers who were involved in the 2021 redistricting process have previously cited 2020 census numbers meeting population requirements of the Voting Rights Act for creating those subdistricts. Republican House Majority Leader Mike Lefor maintains the process was done correctly.
veryGood! (1917)
Related
- North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
- Amazon Fires Spark Growing International Criticism of Brazil
- After a patient died, Lori Gottlieb found unexpected empathy from a stranger
- Climate Change Is Transforming the Great Barrier Reef, Likely Forever
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- Prince Harry's Spare Ghostwriter Recalls Shouting at Him Amid Difficult Edits
- Christian McCaffrey's Birthday Tribute to Fiancée Olivia Culpo Is a Complete Touchdown
- What’s Eating Away at the Greenland Ice Sheet?
- Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
- Below Deck Alum Kate Chastain Addresses Speculation About the Father of Her Baby
Ranking
- Rams vs. 49ers highlights: LA wins rainy defensive struggle in key divisional game
- PHOTOS: If you had to leave home and could take only 1 keepsake, what would it be?
- Contaminated cough syrup from India linked to 70 child deaths. It's happened before
- The FDA has officially declared a shortage of Adderall
- Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
- 236 Mayors Urge EPA Not to Repeal U.S. Clean Power Plan
- How does air quality affect our health? Doctors explain the potential impacts
- After a patient died, Lori Gottlieb found unexpected empathy from a stranger
Recommendation
A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
Funeral company owner allegedly shot, killed pallbearer during burial of 10-year-old murder victim
Artificial intelligence could soon diagnose illness based on the sound of your voice
Today’s Climate: July 12, 2010
Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie return for an 'Encore,' reminisce about 'The Simple Life'
Colonoscopies save lives. Doctors push back against European study that casts doubt
IRS sends bills to taxpayers with the wrong due date for some
Trump seeks new trial or reduced damages in E. Jean Carroll sexual abuse case