Current:Home > MyA federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court -ProfitZone
A federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court
View
Date:2025-04-17 06:21:25
HOUSTON (AP) — A federal judge on Wednesday declared illegal a revised version of a federal policy that prevents the deportation of hundreds of thousands of immigrants brought to the U.S. as children.
U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen agreed with Texas and eight other states suing to stop the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program. The judge’s ruling was ultimately expected to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, sending the program’s fate before the high court for a third time.
Hanen barred the government from approving any new applications, but left the program intact for existing recipients during the expected appeals process. Hanen said his order does not require the federal government to take any actions against DACA recipients.
The states have argued the Obama administration didn’t have the authority to first create the program in 2012 because it circumvented Congress.
In 2021, Hanen had declared the program illegal, ruling it had not been subject to public notice and comment periods required under the federal Administrative Procedures Act.
The Biden administration tried to satisfy Hanen’s concerns with a new version of DACA that took effect in October 2022 and was subject to public comments as part of a formal rule-making process.
But Hanen, who was appointed by then-President George W. Bush in 2002, ruled the updated version of DACA was still illegal. He had previously said DACA was unconstitutional and it would be up to Congress to enact legislation shielding people under the program, often known as “Dreamers.”
Hanen also had previously ruled the states had standing to file their lawsuit because they had been harmed by the program.
The states have claimed they incur hundreds of millions of dollars in health care, education and other costs when immigrants are allowed to remain in the country illegally. The states that sued are Texas, Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Carolina, West Virginia, Kansas and Mississippi.
Those defending the program — the federal government, the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund and the state of New Jersey — had argued the states failed to present evidence that any of the costs they allege they have incurred have been tied to DACA recipients. They also argued Congress has given the Department of Homeland Security the legal authority to set immigration enforcement policies.
Despite previously declaring the DACA program illegal, Hanen had left the Obama-era program intact for those already benefiting from it. But he had ruled there could be no new applicants while appeals were pending.
There were 578,680 people enrolled in DACA at the end of March, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
The program has faced a roller coaster of court challenges over the years.
In 2016, the Supreme Court deadlocked 4-4 over an expanded DACA and a version of the program for parents of DACA recipients. In 2020, the high court ruled 5-4 that the Trump administration improperly ended DACA, allowing it to stay in place.
In 2022, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld Hanen’s earlier ruling declaring DACA illegal, but sent the case back to him to review changes made to the program by the Biden administration.
President Joe Biden and advocacy groups have called on Congress to pass permanent protections for “ dreamers.” Congress has failed multiple times to pass proposals called the DREAM Act to protect DACA recipients.
veryGood! (78)
Related
- California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
- 'The Sopranos' star Drea de Matteo says teen son helps her edit OnlyFans content
- US Sen. Bob Menendez of New Jersey is resigning from office following his corruption conviction
- Silicon Valley-backed voter plan for a new California city won’t be on the November ballot after all
- Meet the volunteers risking their lives to deliver Christmas gifts to children in Haiti
- Google makes abrupt U-turn by dropping plan to remove ad-tracking cookies on Chrome browser
- Simone Biles' husband, Jonathan Owens, will get to watch Olympics team, all-around final
- The facts about Kamala Harris' role on immigration in the Biden administration
- Who's hosting 'Saturday Night Live' tonight? Musical guest, how to watch Dec. 14 episode
- Nordstrom Anniversary Sale 2024: The Best Deals on Accessories From Celine, Dagne Dover, Coach & More
Ranking
- North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
- Death row inmate in South Carolina resentenced to life in prison
- Florida’s only historically Black university names interim president
- Miss Kansas Alexis Smith Calls Out Her Alleged Abuser Onstage in Viral Video
- Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
- Harris to visit battleground Wisconsin in first rally as Democrats coalesce around her for president
- Instagram is rolling out changes to Notes. Here's what to know
- Toronto Film Festival lineup includes movies from Angelina Jolie, Mike Leigh, more
Recommendation
Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
Miss Kansas Alexis Smith Calls Out Her Alleged Abuser Onstage in Viral Video
For Appalachian Artists, the Landscape Is Much More Than the Sum of Its Natural Resources
US opens investigation into Delta after global tech meltdown leads to massive cancellations
Opinion: Gianni Infantino, FIFA sell souls and 2034 World Cup for Saudi Arabia's billions
This state was named the best place to retire in the U.S.
‘We were built for this moment': Black women rally around Kamala Harris
Attorneys for state of Utah ask parole board to keep death sentence for man convicted in 1998 murder